If Kuebix was your quoting and rating workflow, you're not choosing whether to move. You're only choosing where to land, and on someone else's timeline. The honest answer depends entirely on which part of Kuebix you actually relied on, so start there rather than with a vendor shortlist.
If you used Kuebix to rate-shop and book across your carriers
This was the most common use, and it's the cleanest migration. Emerge replaces that workflow and widens it: your own carriers plus a marketplace of 45,000+ pre-vetted carriers competing on the same request, benchmarking on every award so you can see whether a rate is actually good, truckload and LTL in one workflow, and deployment measured in days. Pricing is usage-based, so what you pay scales with the freight you move.
If you used Kuebix as your full TMS
If tracking, documents, and settlement all lived in Kuebix, you need a TMS, not a procurement platform. 3G is Trimble's named migration path; Shipwell is the other credible modern option. Many shippers in this position land the TMS first and then add a procurement layer on top, because a TMS replacement chosen under time pressure rarely has the carrier competition depth Kuebix users were used to.
If you're small and LTL-only
MyCarrier is the simplest landing spot: direct LTL quoting against your own carrier accounts, with a free tier. If LTL is genuinely all you move, the simplicity is the feature. If truckload is in your mix too, you'll end up running two tools, which is worth knowing before you commit.
Where Kuebix users typically land
| What you used Kuebix for | Where to look | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Rate-shopping and booking across carriers | Emerge | Same job, more carriers in competition, benchmarking at award, live in days |
| Full TMS: tracking, docs, settlement | 3G or Shipwell | You need execution, which a procurement platform deliberately doesn't do |
| LTL only, small volume | MyCarrier | Thinnest tool for the narrowest need |
| TMS plus serious carrier competition | TMS plus Emerge | Adjacent layers; the TMS moves freight, Emerge decides what it costs |
The migration reality check: it's the data, not the software
The painful part of leaving a sunset platform is almost never learning the new interface. It's the lanes, the negotiated rates, and the carrier history, the institutional memory that makes your next bid smarter than your last one. Get an export before you need it, and make "how do I get my data out" a question you ask the next vendor on the first call rather than the last.
Emerge onboarding imports your lane and carrier data as part of setup, which is why "days, not quarters" holds even for a migration.
What the Kuebix shutdown should change about how you evaluate software
The uncomfortable lesson isn't that Trimble behaved badly. It's that a freight tool can be big, widely used, and owned by a serious company, and still disappear, taking your workflow with it. Thousands of shippers re-platformed on a schedule they didn't choose.
So durability belongs on the evaluation sheet next to features. Three practical proxies: is the product the vendor's core business or a side bet inside a larger portfolio? Is their revenue model aligned with the product actually succeeding? And can you export everything, today, without filing a support ticket? No vendor can promise forever, but the ones with good answers to those three have incentives pointed at keeping you.
Frequently asked questions
Why was Kuebix shut down?
Trimble discontinued the Kuebix TMS platform, as covered by FreightWaves, and directed customers toward preferred replacements including 3G. Kuebix was an acquisition inside a much larger portfolio, and when priorities shifted it was the product that got retired.
What is the best Kuebix alternative?
It depends on what you used it for. For carrier competition and procurement, Emerge. For a full TMS replacement, 3G (Trimble's named path) or Shipwell. For LTL-only small shippers, MyCarrier. Anyone recommending a single answer without asking how you used Kuebix is guessing.
How long does migrating off Kuebix take?
For procurement, days rather than quarters, because lane and carrier data import as part of onboarding and there's no execution layer to re-platform. A full TMS replacement is a materially bigger project and should be planned as one.
Start with the quoting
If rate-shopping was the part of Kuebix you'll miss, that's the fastest thing to replace. Here's the full guide to freight quoting software for shippers.
Other comparisons: Emerge vs. Shipwell · Emerge vs. Freightos · Emerge vs. spreadsheets and email
SOC 2 Type II